BrowserStack

For testing the website on different browsers or on different devices we use BrowserStack.
While using the BrowserStack we solve one of the biggest problem we were facing that is we are getting everything means every browser at single place and that is more feasible for us To use it.

The main purpose of using BrowserStack in the organization is to test cross-browser compatibility and whether the website is working fine in different browsers or not. It also offers multiple virtual devices like Android phones, iPhones, Tablets, and desktop devices with multiple OS where the website can be tested virtually to ensure the functioning of the site.

We use Browserstack to detect browser and device related issues when running our mobile games. Our QA departement uses both Android and iOS devices to guarantee that our games are compatible with as many users as possible.

I can only speak for my team but we mainly use it for visual regression testing

Test new versions of software on different devices Test new versions of software on different browsers and browser versions Automate browser tests Test on the latest and older devices and operating systems

In my current role at Coursera, we rely on BrowserStack Percy for efficient visual testing. It offers pixel-perfect visual reviews, ensuring UIs appear and function correctly across different devices and screen sizes. At my previous company, Acquire, we used BrowserStack for every e2e testing across web and mobile platforms. Despite a higher price for running parallel tests, BrowserStack's top-notch features justified the cost. The tool notably expedites testing processes, saving valuable development time. It consistently ensures that applications work as intended on all platforms, delivering high-quality user experiences irrespective of the device or OS used. BrowserStack, though pricey, is a worthy investment for thorough e2e testing.

Me and my team was using BrowserStack for our automation suites, it was much more faster and easy to use on its UI than what we are using currently. I would like switch back on Browserstack.

We use the App Live product to assist in compatibility testing across a wide range of devices. Since we are remote first, our distribution of staff makes managing a large library of physical devices impractical, and the solution offered by BrowserStack enables us to test a broad range of devices and operating systems with ease and efficiency. We have aspirations to make use of other features offered by BrowserStack.

We use BrowserStack to test how our sites look on different web browsers and mobile devices. Additionally, we use it for mobile automation.

We use BrowserStack to test the mobile designs.
Developers used the BroswerStack to apply the designs for mobile devices having iOS and Android Operating Systems.
There is no any good tool, that helps to apply the mobile design on-live. BS is the best option available.
Only challenge with BS is sometimes it becomes very slow. Otherwise BS is best tool for developing and testing the mobile changes.

I use BrowserStack to test my application in different devices and browser versions to ensure the compatibility of our solution. This greater coverage of testing is a great factor in appealing to the client to the fact that we take the service seriously and the users and their technology needs personally.

Testing in multiple browsers AND devices is a MUST if you work doing QA like me. I wouldn't have been able to make a proper testing of our clients' websites without BrowserStack's cross-device testing feature, because I only own an iPhone and a PC device. Also, I like that you can switch between screen resolutions easily.

I am a part of UI Engineering team where multiple product teams working towards building online banking application. We use BrowserStack application to automate Mobile test to rapid development of product and increase productivity in team. BrowserStack help us rapid prototype development and share prototype to different stakeholders so we get feedback from User experience team, Quality Assurance team, and beta user team. BrowserStack does wonderful job when product is complex and different team working on a same product. We also communicate with BrowserStack team for suggestion, queries and any feedback.

I have used BrowserStack in few mobile application and Web based projects where we had to test the compatibility of the website on more than 10 devices and behaviour on different Operating systems and environments. BrowserStack came on really handy to test multiple scenarios and achieve good coverage. As we do not have the luxury of having multiple devices for testing purposes, we rely on cloud platform.

I build a website every summer for summer night concerts in the amazing gardens of the Real Alcázar in Sevilla, for a company called Actidea. We use a homemade CMS called PathFinder, which Julio Antileo and I built, and a CodeIgniter frontend on a Linux server.

Together with Diana Pinasco as the fabulous designer she is, we work on a new version each year and need to test the results in browsers of all kinds and sizes. This year's website needed extra testing as both design and user experience changed quite a bit, we added the possibility to choose dark or light mode at will, changed the way the menu works, and had new colors, structures, and layouts. I used BrowserStack to test the site in all flavors of mobile devices browsers, and desktops, and it was awesome as always. The site is quite bulletproof and battle-tested since 2001, though the first versions were done in, believe it, Flash Actionscript.

I remember the first time using BrowserStack as a decisive and defining moment when the responsive design really took off, and much more work than now. This time I had a lot to check for new things, but it all seemed to all work right mostly. I do have to sincerely recommend BrowserStack's live testing, I doubt there's something better around.

BrowserStack has been an invaluable asset for our company, enabling us to test our web applications across a variety of environments efficiently and effectively. With its expansive library of real devices and browsers, we're able to ensure compatibility and seamless user experience across all platforms. The Live feature, which allows us to interact with our apps on different devices, has been crucial for catching UI inconsistencies and potential usability issues. With integrated developer tools, testing has never been more streamlined. Integration with automation tools like Selenium has significantly enhanced our functional testing process, improving the speed and accuracy of our test executions. Alongside Percy, which we use for visual testing, BrowserStack has revolutionized our testing workflow by offering a comprehensive solution for both functional and visual testing.

We use BrowserStack for Testing both our Web and Mobile Apps. The problem we had was the browser-based inspection tool was limited and we had a limited number of physical mobile devices to test with. We use the tool for functional manual testing, regression and smoke testing.

I use browserstack for running our cypress e2e test across different browsers i.e cross browser testing . I have also got a chance to explore the live product for testing our product across various devices. browser stack is helpful as it offers a neat UI, step by step instruction to be followed to use it efficiently. it is simple to use and cost effective compared to other products in market

I use BrowserStack to conduct multiple testing types of User scenarios, such as connectivity, time zone changes, low battery, different OS version that we don't have on-premise, different brands, and also automation of key areas within our mobile app. The product allows us to test against many devices we don't have available on-premise, this includes several of the key OS across multiple brands as well as several of the different key versions that are currently most popular against our market share of End Users. Browser stack helps us broaden our testing effort as well as helping us test against areas we aren't able to make possible on-premise like connectivity issues when changing from different network connections.

At PartyGames.ai we need to make sure that all our users get a polished and consistent experience no matter what device they are on. BrowserStack saves us countless hours by allowing us to easily test across a vast array of devices allowing us to track down and fix bugs and deliver the best version of our platform to our users.

I am UI/UX Technical Lead in Exela Technologies, Myself and my team will use BrowserStack daily to Cross browser testing task and mobile UI/UX testing Task. Its very help full to test all latest and important real devices and for Windows Mac resolution testing also its very useful.

We used BrowserStack for testing our app on various desktop and native platforms. This software has enabled our small team to verify functionality and user experience on devices we don't have on hand. We used it for troubleshooting issues that were device-specific and for this it was invaluable.

We use BrowserStack products like Live, App Live & Automate to test our website on different devices browsers. And to test iOS App on different Apple devices and iOS versions. We run our selenium automation scripts against BrowserStack Automate.

BrowserStack is used in our project team to test the online banking application in different devices supporting different OS like Android, iOS, Windows etc. Along with the app, multi-device browser testing is also done for website version of online banking.BrowserStack has all the wide range of different devices with different screen sizes, that gives us an opportunity to test the application on different modes.

We use it for Cross Browser/ Cross Device and compatibility testing- both manual and automation. This is a single ground where you can test on variety of available devices/versions/OS etc. This is very powerful tool. We use it daily for running regression and it is worthy and very reliable.